Cleverbit Software
Cleverbit Software

AGENTIC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

underline-blue-large

Moving fast… without breaking things

BOOK A FREE CONSULTATION

Most development teams are already using AI. What’s less clear is where the risks sit and what controls are actually needed.

This webinar recording cuts through the noise. It covers what changes when code generation becomes cheap but governance, verification and discipline remain the bottlenecks. If your organisation is adopting AI and wants to move faster without losing control, this is the session for you.

What’s covered

  • What Vibe Code Drift is and why it matters
  • How AI tools change engineering risk exposure
  • Security and architecture risks from low-scrutiny AI code
  • How to adopt a no-trust posture for AI
  • Agentic review workflows combining AI with human oversight
  • Practical steps to maintain speed and improve assurance
BOOK A FREE CONSULTATION

What attendees are saying

Jeremy Pullicino
Director of Engineering
Machete Tech

I found the webinar refreshing; there was no sales pitch and it was not an "AI will solve the worlds problems" vibe. Quite opposite, it was an eye opener about how careful we need to be with this tech and its promises."

AI solutions Developer

"I enjoyed the Agentic Software Development webinar. It was concise, practical, and gave a good picture of how agentic systems can enhance development workflows. It was a valuable session, and I'm glad I attended."

Mustafa Arınmış
Backend Software Engineer
SAN TSG

"The webinar was very useful. I came across the concept of "Dark Code" for the first time, which I found very interesting. The topic was also timely for us, as we're currently adding LLMs to our SDLC"

Chris Attard
Director
QuickFix Malta

"Honestly it was a very well informed webinar. Eman presented the material in a way that made me stop and genuinely assess where I sit as an AI_assisted builder."

Sofia Cassarino
QA Analyst

"I joined as a QA engineer, and the"Vibe Code Drift" part was very relevant to me. The idea that behaviour gets assumed rather than properly verified is something QA people deal with all the time, so it was good to hear it framed so clearly."

Scroll to Top